Alexander’s remarks come during a 60-day review of the federal government’s cybersecurity efforts ordered by President Obama that could end with responsibilities being reshuffled between agencies. Melissa Hathaway, who worked for the director of national intelligence in the Bush administration and is conducting the review, is scheduled to give a public talk on Wednesday.
(Credit:
CNET/Declan McCullagh)
“2009 is the tipping point,” Lentz said. “The reality is the bad guys are going to be in our networks,” and officials have to figure out how to best detect and contain the threats, he said.
On Tuesday, Robert Lentz, chief information assurance officer for the Department of Defense, said the agency is attempting to protect 15,000 networks, 7 million computers, and 1.1 billion Defense Department Internet users worldwide. There are 360 million probes targeted at Defense Department networks each day, compared to the 1 million probes an average major U.S. bank gets per month, he said.
High-level officials understand the seriousness of cyberthreats and understand that “airplanes can’t fly if the network is down,” he said. “The biggest challenge is turning geek-speak into things they can understand.”
On Tuesday, Alexander did note that the NSA “has tremendous technical abilities” and suggested that crisis management might benefit from centralization. “The question is: What happens in a time of crisis? We don’t have a way of seeing and sharing networks today in a timely manner.”
SAN FRANCISCO–The director of the National Security Agency on Tuesday downplayed reports of the NSA’s attempt to wrest control of cybersecurity responsibilities from rival federal agencies.
Other topics of discussion at the RSA conference included cyberattacks by foreign governments–a Wall Street Journal report on Tuesday said some sensitive files related to the Pentagon’s Joint Strike Fighter Project had been electronically viewed–and the recent Conficker worm.
CNET’s Elinor Mills contributed to this report.
Much of Alexander’s remarks appeared to be a response to Rod Beckstrom, former director of Homeland Security’s National Cybersecurity Center, whose resignation letter last month blasted what he described as an NSA power grab that could threaten “our democratic processes.” That led some members of Congress — including the Democratic chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee — to object to NSA control, which Clinton-era FBI director Louis Freeh echoed a day later.
The announcement of the review led to speculation that the White House’s National Security Council or NSA would be handed more cybersecurity responsibilities, along with a larger budget to carry them out. Although the 2002 law creating DHS centralized cybersecurity responsibilities, it has been repeatedly criticized by government auditors who concluded that DHS failed to live up to its responsibilities and may be “unprepared” for emergencies.
Instead, Alexander said, the Department of Homeland Security should continue to oversee Internet and computer security for civilian agencies, while the NSA would provide that service for military agencies.
“We do not want to run cybersecurity for the U.S. government,” Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander said at the RSA security conference here.
Asked after his talk if he believed reports that Chinese cyber spies had
infiltrated the department’s network, Lentz said “probably.”
The department has a lot of work to do to change the network protection policy from one based on bolting together disparate security tools to one where protective tools are interoperable and integrated, according to Lentz.
Within the next week or so the agency expects to have an identity assurance strategy that will include biometrics for authenticating identity of network users and identification of devices like routers and switches, he said.